The Town of
Westborough is located in Worcester County in the east central part of
Massachusetts (Figure 3.1). Westborough
emerged from a western borough of Marlborough near Lake Chauncy, and became
incorporated in the year 1717.
Comprising an area of about 21 square miles, the municipality is
bordered on the north by Northborough, on the east by Hopkinton and Southborough,
on the south by Upton, and on the west by Grafton and Shrewsbury.
Figure 3.1
Regional Context Map

Westborough's glacial past carved out its
characteristic rolling hills and broad expanses of gently sloping wetland areas. Over time, these areas were slowly covered
with forest. The highest upland area is Fay Mountain at 707 feet above sea
level, and the lowest point is 300 feet above sea level.
Cedar Swamp, Crane Swamp, and the man-made SuAsCo
flood control project are the three main wetland habitats in Westborough. Cedar Swamp at the southeast end of
Westborough covers approximately 1,500 acres.
The Metropolitan District Commission (MDC) owns about one-third of this
swamp with the remaining portions owned by the nonprofit group, Sudbury Valley
Trustees (SVT) and other private owners.
Crane Swamp to the north covers approximately 270 acres and is owned by
the MDC and the SVT. The SuAsCo flood
control project in the west covers about 550 acres and is managed primarily by
the Department of Environmental Management (DEM). This pond not only provides flood control but also a good habitat
for wetland wildlife.
The headwaters of the Assabet and Sudbury Rivers
originate in Westborough. The northern
watershed, where Hocomonco Pond and Lake Chauncy are located, drains into the
Assabet River. The southern watershed,
where the Westborough Reservoir is located, drains into Cedar Swamp, thus
giving rise to the Sudbury River.
Once an agricultural community noted for its
extensive apple orchards and active dairies, Westborough has undergone a period of rapid growth
and transformation during the past four
decades. This growth has occurred in
several stages that reflect the classic land investment pattern. The pattern is
based on the value in land (i.e., "economic rent"), which is created
by accessibility (transportation linkages) and access (exposure to traffic),
and is made tangible by the investment in real property needed to realize a
return on this value. In the years
following World War II, the process of residential surburbanization began as a
function of the link with Worcester provided by Route 9. With the completion of the Massachusetts
Turnpike in the early 1950's, including a Route 9 interchange at Framingham,
commuting to Boston became feasible.
More importantly, jobs were created along the Route 128 corridor, where
commuting from Westborough was practical.
As a result, residential growth accelerated. Finally, the completion of Interstate 495 and the interchanges at
both Route 9 and the Mass Pike in the late 1960's stimulated an explosion of
retail, office, and industrial development which continued into the
1980's. Today, Westborough faces a continuation of its commercial and
industrial growth, along with a new wave of residential development attracted by the town's central location and good
infrastructure.
Before
recorded time, Westborough was known as a crossroads. As early as 7,000 B.C.,years, before
present time, prehistoric people in dugout canoes followed
the Sudbury and Assabet Rivers up to their headwaters in search of quartzite
for tools and weapons. During the Late
Woodland Period (1200-1600 A.D.), seasonal migrations brought Nipmuc Indians to
hunt and fish near Cedar Swamp and Hocomonco Pond. Using Fay Mountain as a landmark, Indians crisscrossed
Westborough on well-worn paths: the old Connecticut Path leading west from
Massachusetts Bay; the Narragansett Trail leading south, and a trail (along the
present Milk Street) leading to Canada.
The
English explorer John Oldham followed these trails through Westborough in 1633.
Settlers in search of fertile farmlands followed not long after. By the late 1600's, a few families had
settled near Lake Chauncy, in the "west borough" of Marlborough. In the early 1700's, the Fay and Rice
families cultivatedout large farms along the present day
West Main Street.
On
November 18, 1717, Westborough was incorporated as the hundredth town in
Massachusetts, populated by twenty-seven families. Soon large farms were carved out, mills were built along the
Assabet River and Jack Straw Brook, and taverns flourished.
The
industrial progress of the entire country is indebted to Eli Whitney, Jr.,
Westborough's most famous native son.
Born in 1765, Whitney invented the cotton gin in 1795 that invigorated
the cotton industry, and in 1798 he was a pioneer in mass production in the
United States at his Whitney Arms Company in New Haven, Connecticut.
In
1810, the route from Boston to Worcester was straightened and improved into an
official turnpike (the present Route 9).
Along its Westborough route, the Wesson Tavern, the Forbush Tavern, and
the Nathan Fisher store prospered. The
center of commerce shifted downtown in 1834 with the arrival of the steam train
through Westborough's center. The
railroad brought a new era to the town's industry. Over the next century, local factories shipped boots and shoes,
straw hats, sleighs, textiles, bicycles, and eventually abrasive products,
across the nation. Westborough dairies
supplied cities with milk, and local greenhouses shipped out carnations, while
the eight orchards found ready markets for their produce.
There are many historic sites and buildings in Westborough
including: the Sibley house (sleigh maker’s house) and the Nathan Fisher House
(was a store next to the Wesson Tavern) as well as the whole West Main Street
Historical District that includes houses that date back to the 1700s. The West
Main Street Historical District starts at the rotary extends west on West Main
Street to the Country Club, from the rotary up Milk Street to Fisher and down
Fay Street to West Street. The Charles Street and Cross Street area is being
added as well.
Archeological sites include: Cedar Swamp (an archeological
historic district), Charlestown Meadows, Downtown Crossing, Lake Chauncy,
Hocomonco Pond and Computer and Research Drives. Thousands of artifacts were
excavated from these sites. Some are on a rotating display at the Historical
Commission office.
The
land -- its location and its harvests -- have played a major role in the
economic vitality of the town. In 1880,
a total of 4,205 acres were cultivated on 155 Westborough farms (a list of
farms circa 1930 and their present status are shown in Appendix Error!
Reference source not found.).
By
the 1890's, Westborough had become known as the Milk Town with milk from its
1,055 dairy cows shipped to Boston by the local C. Brigham & Company, at
the time the largest milk company in the world. Dairying remained an important livelihood through the 1930's,
when 40 dairies could be counted along the major roads in town. After World War II, mechanization and added
public health regulations made the cost of dairying prohibitive for many
Westborough farmers. The number of
dairies dwindled until there was only one small dairy operating in 1975, Howard
Uhlman's on East Main Street. In 1996,
Uhlman’s was discontinued after a devastating barn fire.
In
the early decades of the 20th century, there were eight sizeable apple and
peach orchards in Westborough: on Spring Road and Morse Street to the south,
Adams Street and West Main Street to the west, and Fisher Street and Chestnut
Street nearer the town's center. In
1975, three orchards remained: Quick Orchard on Adams Street, as well as Parker
Orchard and Arnold Orchard on Spring Road. Presently, only
one pick-your-own orchard, Arnold's on Spring Road, has not become a residentialBy 2000, the large Arnold
Orchard had closed its operation, the majority of the Parker Orchard has been
converted to house lots, and Quick’s Orchard had become The Ridings and the
Orchards subdivision.
Although
Westborough joined the housing boom after World War II when single home
developments began to proliferate along its main roads, large plots still
existed in Westborough in 1960. That
year, there were 106 parcels listed on the assessor's map that contained 10 acres
or more, for a total of 4,602 acres of farm or forest land, 33 percent of the
town (refer to Appendix Error!
Reference source not found. for a complete inventory). As of January 1996, timber forestland and agriculture land
account for 929 acres or 6.7 percent of the town's land. In 2000, only 710
acres remained as active agriculture or forestry lands under Chapter 61 and
61A.
Currently,
two farms on the western border of the town have been preserved under the
Agricultural Preservation Act. The
development rights for 140 acres of the historic Nourse Farm were purchased by
a Town Meeting vote in 1980, and 48 acres of the nearby Glenrock Farm were
protected under the same provision in 1987.
For several years, the Good Earth Community Supported
Agriculture Project has yielded organically grown vegetables for member
families who buy shares and contribute their labor under the direction of Good
Earth farmer Susan Andersen. This community farm is on six acres of cultivated
land leased from St. Luke’s Cemetery and bordering Cedar Swamp off Hopkinton
Road. The harvest lasts 23 weeks and includes a wide variety of organic
vegetables, from corn and potatoes to eggplants and many varieties of greens. The farm is
managed organically, so that no
synthetic pesticides, herbicides or fertilizers are used. The sustainable pPractices employed
at Good Earth to promote sustainable local agriculture are crop
rotation, fertilizing with compost and manure, and cover cropping.
At
present, farm standsa farm stand
at the Harvey farm on South Street and the Berberian
farm on Otis Street supplysupplies local produce in season. TwoTwo other
farmers raise and sell fruits and vegetables - Lillian Grove on South Street
cultivates blueberries, andblueberries;
Jon Nourse on
Nourse Street cultivates strawberries, raspberries and pumpkins. The threesmall
nurseries that cultivate annuals and perennials include The Green Thumb on
Route 9, Harvey’s
on South Street and Wilkinson's (Hi-Hill) farm on West MainStreet,
and Mugford's Shop on East Main Street. By the year 2000, Red’s
(Berberian) farm and farm stand were inactive.
Today,
Route 9 is a booming state highway, but in the first half of the 20th century,
two large dairies and a peach orchard to the east and three dairies and a
turkey farm to the west dominated its stretch through Westborough. MacGuffog Greenhouse near Route 9 and Lyman
Street raised and shipped carnations throughout the world. In the dawn of the age of the automobile,
the Farrar and Hooper tourist cabins at the Southborough border offered
travelers a scenic refuge.
The
completion of the Massachusetts Turnpike in 1964 and Interstate 495 in 1965,
followed soon after with their interchanges at Route 9, transformed Westborough
into the crossroads of these major transportation networks. The town's prime location has continued to
attract industries to settle along its Route 9 and I- 495 highway corridor. In fact, at the
beginning of the 21st century, the I-495 West Corridor is
recognized nationwide as a major industrial/commercial growth region.
In
1964, Massachusetts Electric/New England Power sited its headquarters on Route
9, near the junction of I-495. Data
General built its world headquarters on Route 9 in 1977, and soon other
businesses followed to populate large office and technology parks on the
highway corridor.
In
the next decade, industrial and commercial development flourished. The Westborough Business Park was
constructed on 100 acres beside New England Power/National Grid
on Route 9 in 1982. The next year, the Westborough Office Park opened its first
buildings on 138 acres on the southeast corner of Route 9 and I-I-495
and Westborough Executive Park developed 15 acres. In 1985, the Westborough
Technology Park opened on 78 acres at the northwest corner of Route 9 and
I-495. A few companies located in the Westborough business parks include
American Superconductor, Arch Wireless, EMC, ePresence, General Electric,
Genzyme, NORESCO, Tibersoft Corporation, Westborough Marriott, and White
Electronics Designs Corporation. AstraZeneca opened its national headquarters
in 1982 in the Otis Street industrial zone on the town's western border.
Warehouses have occupied the rest of Otis Street, and Solectron occupies a
production plan west of Hocomonco Pond.
To
serve Westborough's growing commuter and residential population, large shopping
centers, restaurants, and auto dealers claimed most of the remaining open land
along Route 9. Julio's Shopping Plaza
and West Meadow Plaza both opened in 1971.
In the 1990's, large discount centers such as B.J's, SAM's Club (Target
in 2002), and WalMart as well as TJ Max and a Super Stop & Shop were added to
the Route 9 corridor. New shopping centers were constructed at
Stagecoach Plaza on Route 9 and Milk Street and at Great Way Plaza on Route 9
near Otis Street.
Westborough’s commercial development was
outstripped by residential growth in the 1990s; nevertheless, five new hotels
have been built or are under construction. Besides the existing Wyndham Hotel,
new hotels are: Sierra Suites (Computer Drive), Courtyard Inn by Marriott
(Technology Drive), Residence Inn (Connector Road), Studio Plus on East Main Street,
and Hilton Garden Inn and Extended Stay America on Connector
Road. In addition, substantial
commercial buildings have been added to Westborough’s office parks on Friberg
Parkway, Connector Road, Technology Drive, Flanders Road and West Park Drive.
EMC has purchased land to construct a major facility for 4,000 to 6,000
employees on Route 9 at the Westborough/Southborough border. With the addition
of an MBTA commuter train station at Smith Valve Parkway in 2002, the
commercial development will continue to increase.
The Route 495 West Corridor emerged as one of the
fastest growing, most attractive commercial/industrial regions in the nation in
the 1990s. Nearly 29 percent of all the manufacturing jobs in the Commonwealth
are located along Route I-495, particularly centered on information
technology. Concern over preserving the economic growth and quality of life in
the region prompted businesspeople, local and state officials, and
environmental groups to create the I-495 Technology Corridor Initiative in 1998.
The Initiative was co-founded by a state senator and a state representative
with these goals: to enhance the fiscal stability of I-495 corridor towns, to
maintain a competitive business climate and to protect the natural environment.
After
World War II, the demand for housing for returning veterans resulted in the
construction of the first housing developments along Lyman Street on Shepherd
Road and Chauncy Circle.
In
the 1950's, houses began to spread from the town center toward the Grafton
boundary; three large farms, the Aronson Cattle Farm, Vinal Hill Dairy, and
McTaggart Orchard were developed into single-family home subdivisions.
The
demand for residences grew as the Town's industrial and commercial sector
boomed in the 1960's through the 1980's.
Its excellent schools and rural character drew new families to
Westborough. Single-family homes were
constructed on the northwest corner and the southern end of Town near the
reservoir. Large apartment complexes
housed renters at Fountainhead and Windsor Ridge along Route 9.
In 1960, the population of Westborough was 9,599 with
1,578 households; in 1970 the population had risen to 12,594 with 2,200
households; and in 1995 the population was 15,745 with 6,317 households.
households. In
the 2000 U.S. census, Westborough’s population was 17,997 with 6,534
households. A build-out analysis was conducted in 2000 that develops all
the remaining open parcels as zoned. The build-out population is projected by the
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs to be between 20,865 to 23,354 (the
higher number includes apartments and comprehensive permits). This increase of
new residents would generate a need for an additional 1,755 to 2,000 homes.
The Town Planner, Jim Robbins, believes these projections were overstated. Mr.
Robbins estimates 575-709 new single-family homes at build-out based on a more
comprehensive analysis of actual soil conditions, land location and terrain.
The present decade has
seendecade from 1990 to 2000 saw an increase in the pace for
housing construction, so that the majority of the remaining farms havehave
been transformed into subdivisions. The average number of building permits for single
residences during this ten-year period was 88; the peak occurred in 1995 with
151 single resident permits issued.
The larger developments included: Valley View
Estates (Westborough Chase) was developed on the Roy Farm, Crownridge on the
Llana Farm, The Ridings on Quick's Orchard, Fay Acres on Fay Dairy,on the Roy Farm
[Ruggles Street]; Pheasant Hill on the Lahna Farm [Ruggles and Adams Streets];
The Ridings [Adams and Nash
Streets], Fay Acres on Fay Dairy [West Main Street], Westview Farms and Uhlman
Farms on Uhlman Dairy [East Main Street], the Gables on
Hardscrabble Farm, andFarm [Warren
Street], Assabet Estates on the Dunn Farm.
Farm [Fisher Street], Piccadilly Mill [Morse
Street and Belknap Street], Brigham Rise on Mt. Pleasant Street, Oak Bluffs
off Milk Street, and Indian Pond development with 25 percent affordable homes
off Meadow Road. The last five years include these developments: The
Orchards on Quick’s Orchard [Adams and Nash Streets] with 38 lots, Woodland
Preserve with 38 lots [Andrews Farm – Nourse St], 16 lots at Walnut Knoll
[Chestnut Street], and Wheelock Estates [Maynard Road] with 5 lots.
To serve Westborough residents older than 55, the
Walker Meadow retirement community of duplex homes, totaling 100 units, was constructed
on the Walker Farm [Park Street], and Orchard Hill received permits to build
100 units as condominiums on the Gilmore Farm [Adams Street] which is
partially completed.
The Avalon at Flanders Hill apartment complex on
Flanders Road is nearly complete with 25% of the 280 units set aside as
affordable apartments under a comprehensive Chapter 40B permit.
Motivated by the rapid conversion of farmland into
residential developments, the Board of Selectmen established a Chapter 61A Task
Force, in 1999. This committee has inventoried and examined the
remaining agricultural lands under Chapter 61A in Westborough. The Committee
prioritized the parcels according to their desirability for Town acquisition. If any 61A lands
are offered for sale, the Town can exercise its right of first refusal, guided
by the recommendation of the Chapter 61A Task Force.
Lake
Chauncy Park, developed by Samuel G. Henry in 1876, was the first move to
preserve natural beauty for public enjoyment.
The park remained a popular site for area picnics and field days until
the dance hall burned in 1949. Chauncy Beach,
which continued as a private facility, was purchased by Westborough in 1969 as
the Town beach. In the late 1960's,
Westborough's residential spurt created a demand for more town recreational
facilities and open space for its families.
With
the construction of the Massachusetts Turnpike near the Town reservoir,
residents became concerned about protecting their water supply. Between 1969-1971 the town acquired 144
acres of conservation land around the reservoir with the help of the state's
Self-Help Program.
To
safeguard the future of a popular recreation area, a 1974 Town Meeting voted to
purchase the 109-acre Westborough Country Club from Avco/Dresser Corporation
with financial assistance from the federal and state governments. In the next six years, Town Meeting voted to
purchase land for soccer and baseball fields in the eastern, central, and
southern ends of Westborough.
In
1994, William and Mary Emily Libbey gave 110 acres of their farmland on the
Town's western border as a potential site for an elementary school or for
conservation and passive recreation purposes.
In 1995, Town Meeting voted to purchase a 5.5-acre parcel on the corner
of Upton and Hopkinton Roads to develop as soccer fields known as Hennessy
Field.
Andrews-Nourse property: Following the recommendation of the Westborough
Open Space Preservation Committee, the 1998 Town Meeting voted to purchase, for a sum of $2.6 million, 83 acres adjacent
to the SUASCO Reservoir/Flood Plain (known as Mill Pond) from the former farms
of the Andrews and Nourse
families. Nearly half of this purchase price was paid from the $1 million the
Town had voted previously for Open Space acquisition. This purchase, resulted in 133 acres of open land when
combined with adjacent land protected as Town well sites and a buffer zone
around SUASCO Flood Plain, owned by the Massachusetts Water Resources, produces 133 acres
of open land. At the 1999 Town Meeting, 20 acres outside of the Zone II
aquifer overlay were designated as the site of the Mill Pond Intermediate School that opened in Fall 2002.
ThisThe newly acquired
land is a well-known wildlife habitat, home to a great blue heron rookery, the
only nesting pair of ospreys in Central Massachusetts, and many varieties of waterfowl,
meadow birds, and woodland birds. It has become a popular site for bird walks
run by the Westborough Community Land Trust during the spring
and fall warbler migration. It is also a habitat for foxes, beavers, coyotes, fisher, deer, smaller
woodland mammals and vernal pool amphibians. The Town entered
a Stewardship Agreement with the Westborough Community Land Trust to create and
maintain walking trails on the open space. The land is to be parceled
into Mill Pond School land and open space land.
Open Space Subdivisions: Since 1988, the Town of Westborough has acquired conservation
restrictions with Homeowner’s Associations and the State for open lands
surrounding cluster-zone developments. The open space in this instance is owned
and maintained by the Homeowners’ Associations. Cluster developments with open
space under conservation restrictions include Assabet Estates, Indian Pond,
Brigham Rise, Birchwood Estates, and Piccadilly Mill. As part of the comprehensive permit for the Avalon at Flanders Hill apartments,
several acres were transferred to the Town as open space.
Sawink
Reservation: The Town received a
conservation restriction from Sudbury Valley Trustees for 22
acres of the Sawink Reservation off Smith Street. This conservation restriction
ensures the long-term preservation of open land for public use in return for
the Town’s contribution from the municipal Walkup-Robinson Fund for the
purchase of the Sawink property. Although the conservation restriction
was voted in the early 1990’s, the official legal deed restriction was final in
2001.
Lake Hocomonco: The Environmental
Protection Agency’s (EPA) Super Fund project at Lake Hocomonco on Otis Street to
remove much of the creosote on the lake bottom and to treat the water has been
completed. At the request of the EPA, the Town of Westborough developed a reuse plan
for passive recreation for the 24 acres around the lake and is waiting for the
transfer of the property back to the Town.
The Charm Bracelet Trail: The Westborough Open Space Preservation Committee
(OSPC) has
set a goal
to create a town-wide trail linking public and private open space in
Westborough in a 26-mile loop. With the help of enthusiastic
volunteers, the OSPC has created about one-half of the trails. Through
2005, the OSPC will be meeting with and negotiating easements
with private landowners and working with Town departments to complete the Charm
Bracelet.
Westborough
Community Land Trust: In 1997, the Westborough
Community Land Trust (WCLT), a non-profit group, was incorporated
“to safeguard land to meet the environmental, recreational, agricultural, and
scenic needs of the Town of Westborough and to preserve open space and the
natural character of the land.” Members are motivated to obtain and protect
some of the remaining open space in Westborough, particularly because half of
Westborough’s usable open space had been developed from 1990 to 2000. The WCLT
has received open space parcels from developers, often at the direction of the
Planning Board. In total, the WCLT owns nearly 100 acres of land in
Westborough. A complete list can be found in Chapter 5. The WCLT acts as stewards
to the Town-owned, 60-acre Andrews-Nourse property. WCLT members have been
very active in educating the public about the importance of preserving open
space during their ongoing activities, such as Earth Day events, public
lectures, Biodiversity Days, and Westborough walks.
The
techniques used to project populations of large urban areas are well developed,
but are poorly defined for small town populations. Generally, the smaller the
area, the more important are the current building and migration trends. Because
of this, projecting populations for town-sized areas is more of an art than a
science.
The method used
for Westborough's population projection relies on assumptions about quality of
life issues, such as the school system, proximity to the interstate highways,
as well as assumptions of constant incremental growth. Using local assumptions characterizing the
Town's growth thus produces better projections than established sophisticated
demographic models. The population
projection procedure and assumptions are found in Appendix D.
This
projection does not break down population characteristics into race/ethnic or
special user groups. While these
characteristics are important, comprehensive open space planning must respond
to the needs of the community as a whole.
The
Federal Census in Table 3.1 shows a slow increase in Westborough's population
over the past 40 years until recent times.
The decade between 1990 and 2000 shows a sharp increase in population
and is indicative of the explosive growth in single-family homes and tremendous
residential subdivision development.
This population is documented in the past open space and recreation plan
that notes that between 1988 and 2000 Westborough added approximately 1,323 new
single-family homes. Using census data,
the Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER) inaccurately
forecasted in the previous plan, Westborough's population for the year 2000 at
14,345. This was only an increase of
212 people from 1990 to the year 2000.
It appears that the MISER forecast merely accounts for the natural
increase of births minus deaths as the primary contributor of the
increase. The new MISER population
projections for 2010 indicate that Westborough’s population will reach
approximately 18,346. According to the
Town Clerk, the current population in Westborough as of December 01, 2002, is
18,000. The Planning Board through its
own population projection methodology has projected the population for the year
2007 (which concurs with the expiration date of this newly revised Open Space
and Recreation Plan) to be 19,504.
Table
3.1 Growth Trends
Federal Census
Year Population Population Increase over the Decades % Change over the Decades
1950 - 7,378 ------- -------
1960 - 9,599 +2,221 +30.1%
1970 - 12,594 +2,995 +31.2%
1980 - 13,619 +1,025 +
8.1%
1990 - 14,133 + 514 + 3.7%
2002- 18,000 +3,864 +21.5%
Miser Projections
2010 - 18,346 + 346 + 1.9%
Planning Bd. Projection
2007 - 19,504 +1,504 +
8.3%
As
indicated in the previous plan, the Planning Board’s methodology used to
determine population projections is based upon real parcel data, subdivision
approvals, anticipated subdivision approvals, lot releases and estimated yearly
Approval not Required (ANR) endorsements.
Furthermore, through natural increase (births and deaths) data, which is
obtained by the Town Clerk, the Planning Board obtains a more accurate vital
statistic number.
Figure
3.2 represents anticipated population growth based on current town
records. It must be stressed, that
these figures are projections, and are based on the most accurate data
available to the Planning Board. The
population of 18,000, as provided by the Town Clerk, was used as the start of
the population projection. As shown in
the population projection procedure in Appendix C, this figure was then used to
project Westborough's future population of 19,504 by the end of year 2007. This equates to an average yearly increase
of 300 people per year over the next five years. This number may seem high, but as is explained in Appendix C,
Avalon at Flanders Hill alone has the potential to add 742 new residents to the
Town.
Figure 3.2
Population Projections
|
Year |
Population |
|
2002 |
18,000 |
|
2003 |
19,140 |
|
2004 |
19,231 |
|
2005 |
19,322 |
|
2006 |
19,413 |
|
2007 |
19,504 |
|
2019 |
21,028 |
|
2022 |
21,383 |
+Source: Planning Board 2002
Tables
3.2 and 3.3 show the nature of this growth.
They list all the known present and expected residential subdivisions,
lots not requiring approval under the subdivision control law (ANR), and the
number of lots already approved and released by the Planning Board for
construction.
Table
3.2 House Lot Construction from 2002
through 2007
2002 Lot
Releases (Actual) and 2003 Lot Releases (and beyond)
|
SUBDIVISION |
TOTAL LOTS APPROVED |
LOTS RELEASED as of 12/1/02 |
LOT RELEASES EXPECTED IN 2003. |
|
1. The Orchards at Quick Farm |
38 |
16 |
22 |
|
2. Orchard Hill (townhouses) |
100 |
46 |
54 |
|
3. Avalon at Flanders Hill (apartments) |
280 |
280 |
0 |
|
4. Walnut Knoll |
16 |
13 |
3 |
|
5. Wheelock Estates |
5 |
4 |
1 |
|
6. The Preserve |
38 |
18 |
20 |
|
7. Pond View Estates |
10 |
9 |
1 |
|
TOTAL SUBDIVISION LOTS: |
487
|
386
|
101 |
|
ANR's 2002 |
8 |
8 |
|
|
TOTAL HOUSE LOTS: |
495 |
394 |
101 |
Total Approved New House Lots 2002 and Beyond = 495
Table 3.2 represents all of the current on-going
approved subdivision construction. The Table
indicates the total lots approved and how many lots have been released as of
12/01/02. It also shows the number of
lots expected to be released in 2003.
To date, the Planning Board has approved 495 lots. As of 12/01/02, 394 lots out of the total have
been released for construction. This
means 101 lots remain to be released in 2003.
A total of 8 single family ANR lots were endorsed in 2002.
The
addition of new dwellings does not stop after 2002. Numerous new subdivisions and other housing projects are expected
to come on line after 2002 as shown in Table 3.3.
Table 3.3
Projected Housing Construction From 2003-2007
|
NEW SUBDIVISIONS ANTICIPATED |
(2003 TO 2007) |
|
1. Reservoir Estates |
7 |
|
2. Chauncy Park Condominiums (Pending Appeal) |
18 |
|
3. Lyman School Affordable Housing Project |
35 |
|
4. Potential Subdivision Mt. Pleasant St. |
45 |
|
ANR Lots (5 years at 17 lots/yr
of which 25% actually contribute new single family home construction) |
21 |
|
TOTAL POSSIBLE HOUSE LOTS: |
126 |
Total New Anticipated Lots 2002 thru 2007 = 495(2002-2003) +
126(2003-2007) = 621
Table
3.3 shows that it is projected that 126 lots will be released and built though
the end of the year 2007. Adding the projected 126 dwelling units to the 495 lots
from Table 3.2 produces a total of 621 homes from 2002 through the year
2007. It should be noted that 17 ANR
lots represent the average annual total from the previous seven years but that
only 25% of those ANR endorsements actually contribute to new single home
construction.
Patterns and Trends. The
Town of Westborough has been transformed in recent years from a primarily
residential community to one with significant commercial and industrial
development. The number of business
establishments within the Town has nearly doubled in the past fifteen years,
growing by 87% from 477 in 1985 to 892 in 2000. Similarly, the number of individuals employed within the Town
grew by 67%, increasing from 15,038 in 1985 to 25,050 in 2000. With land values substantially less
expensive than in Boston and Boston’s inner suburbs, Westborough has had a
major role in the development of the I-495 high tech corridor. As developers and companies realized the
value and benefits of locating on the I-495 corridor, Westborough emerged as a
highly desirable locale.
In
addition to the Town’s relative affordability and proximity to Boston,
Westborough also benefits from its close proximity to the interstate system and
the Worcester Regional Airport. Four
major cross-state highways transverse the area: the Worcester Turnpike (Route
9), Route 20, the Massachusetts Turnpike (I-90), and Interstate 495. Additionally, I-190 links the region to the
Fitchburg-Leominister area and I-84 and I-395 provide access to Connecticut and
all points south. Worcester Regional
Airport provides easy access to air travel and the transport of goods and
materials.
Along
with Westborough’s growing commercial and industrial base, the Town’s
population has increased significantly as well. Between 1990 and 2000, the Town’s population grew by 27%, or by
3,864 persons, from its 1990 population of 14,133. While the Town’s commercial and industrial base has helped
sustain the Town’s escalating municipal costs (in 2000, levies on commercial
and industrial lands accounted for 34% of the Town’s total tax levies;
residential land accounted for about 59%), the competing demands for land have
resulted in land use conflicts and a quickly diminishing supply of open space
within the Town.
The
Department of Public Works has developed a Road Improvement Plan and a Sidewalk
Master Plan. Every year the department
renovates several roads within the downtown area and numerous roads throughout
the town. Frequently road improvements
are coordinated with the addition of sewage and replacement of drainage and/or
water service. The department also
works very hard to maintain all of the newly created detention basins and other
sewer and utility easements. The
Planning Board through its Subdivision Regulations and considerable input from
the Town Engineer have established a very detailed set of guidelines for all
new subdivision roadway construction.
This assures that when the town accepts the roadways at Town Meeting,
the roads meet the most stringent town guidelines. Overall, the Town's roads are in very good condition. Easy access to both I-495 and I-90, and
Westborough's reputation for good schools and infrastructure are primary
reasons for the town's continued growth.
The
Department of Public Works is currently updating its 1988 document entitled
“Report Relative to Water System Study Update” by Whitman and Howard
Associates. Furthermore, the Department
is updating their “Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan/Environmental
Impact Report” by Earth Tech.
Concurrently, the Department is writing their “NPDES Storm Water
Management Plan, Phase II” pursuant to EPA regulations. The Water Resources Management Committee
with considerable input from the Conservation Agent is producing a Watershed
Management Plan for Sandra Pond Reservoir and the Planning Board is updating
their 1988 Master Plan by Daylor Consulting Associates.
Long-Term Development Patterns. The
types of land uses and development densities permitted in town are regulated by
Westborough's Zoning Bylaws. The
enclosed zoning map's primary purpose is to show the relationship among land
uses. Table 3.4 outlines the zoning
districts minimum size and frontage requirements.
Table
3.4 Zoning Districts
Zoning District Min. Lot Size Min. Frontage
Residential
Rural Residential 50,000
sq. ft. 200
feet
Single Residential 50,000
sq. ft. 200
feet
Neighborhood Residential 50,000 sq. ft. 200
feet
Garden Apartment
2 acres 140
feet
High Rise Apartments 10 acres 140
feet
Business
Highway Business 30,000
sq. ft. 250
feet
Downtown Business 10,000
sq. ft. 100
feet
Industrial
Exclusive Industrial 15,000
sq. ft. 125
feet
General Industrial 15,000
sq. ft. 125
feet
State, MDC and Municipal District
Town Owned Property --- -----
Conservation --- ------
Residential Build-Out Analysis. It
is unlikely these zoning districts will be changed in the near future. The Planning Board has seen a considerable
decrease in the present rate of growth in comparison to the period between 1990
and 2000. For example, in the previous
plan, the Planning Board anticipated that between 1996 and 2000 there would be
a total of 506 possible new house lots. Conversely the updated plan anticipates
a total of 126 possible new house lots. Furthermore, parcel-by-parcel analysis
shows that most large parcels such as old farms are no longer available, have
vast amounts of wetlands or have other environmental constraints that limit
their development.
The
following section discusses the total amount of residential zoned land within
each of the 13 Planning Areas. It shows how much general industrial, exclusive
industrial, highway business, and downtown business build able land is left as
well as how much state-zoned land is within each zoning district. It should be noted that all state land other
than MDC land is potentially developable.
Methodology. As shown in Figure 3.3, the Town is divided into 13
planning areas with boundaries determined by existing public ways. These areas are based on the transportation
zones (Figure 3.4) established by previous transportation studies. Planning area boundaries do differ from
these zones so that entire vacant land parcels are included in distinct zoning
districts.
Vacant
land is determined to be land in its natural state before development. The assumptions used in the vacant inventory
are as follows:
+ Assumes Chapter 61 properties are
developable.
+ Assumes State (non-MDC) properties are
developable.
+ Assumes Town property will not be used
for development.
+ Assumes Sudbury Valley
Trustees property, agriculture protection restriction property, conservation
zoned property, and open space within approved definitive subdivisions are
undevelopable and therefore not included in the inventory.
+ Assumes parcels larger than 5 acres
with only one home on them to be developable.
After
the vacant land parcels were identified, they were analyzed for slopes 25% and
greater. This and the known wetlands
data taken from the 1982 USGS map were then overlaid onto the identified vacant
parcels. Lastly, the 100-year flood
plain information taken from the May 15, 1980 Flood Insurance Rate was overlaid
onto the identified vacant parcel map.
Any vacant land area outside of these overlays was considered build able
land, while the area within the slopes of 25% and greater, or wetlands, or the
flood plain was considered unbuildable.
On
a parcel- by-parcel, zoning-district- by-zoning-district, and planning-area by
planning-area basis, the vacant land was inventoried for total area and
approximate build able area. This
process was carried out for the entire Town and tallied on build-out worksheets
that are shown in Appendix D. This
information was then summarized for each planning area shown in Table 3.5, and
then condensed to a vacant land summary for the entire Town as shown in Table
3.6. The explanation for each column
heading follows Table 3.6.
Table
3.5 Planning Area Vacant Land
Summaries. Part I (Measured in Acres)
|
Planning Area |
Zoning Districts |
Land Available |
Vacant
Build able Land Available |
Build able Acres Slated for
Develop-ment |
Acres Slated
for Develop-ment |
Net
Vacant Land |
Net Vacant Build able Land |
|
1 |
Residential/PPD |
391 |
287 |
58 |
36 |
333 |
251 |
|
1 |
State |
225 (138 ac.
Tufts) |
184 |
0 |
0 |
225 |
184 |
|
1 |
Total |
616 |
471 |
58 |
36 |
558 |
435 |
|
2 |
Residential |
243 |
150 |
19 |
10 |
224 |
140 |
|
2 |
Total |
243 |
150 |
19 |
10 |
224 |
140 |
|
3 |
Residential/PPD |
189 |
130 |
0 |
0 |
189 |
130 |
|
3 |
State |
64 (Tufts) |
51 |
0 |
0 |
64 |
51 |
|
3 |
General Industrial |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
|
3 |
Total |
256 |
183 |
0 |
0 |
256 |
183 |
|
4 |
Residential |
55 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
55 |
33 |
|
4 |
General Industrial |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
4 |
Total |
57 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
57 |
35 |
|
5N |
Residential |
199 |
54 |
0 |
0 |
199 |
54 |
|
5N |
State |
186 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
186 |
7 |
|
5N |
Exclusive Industrial |
38 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
38 |
6 |
|
5N |
General Industrial |
18 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
1 |
|
5N |
Total |
441 |
68 |
0 |
0 |
441 |
68 |
|
5S |
Residential |
109 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
109 |
16 |
|
5S |
State |
169 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
169 |
19 |
|
5S |
Exclusive Industrial |
201 |
36 |
0 |
0 |
201 |
36 |
|
5S |
General Industrial |
16 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
6 |
|
5S |
Total |
495 |
77 |
0 |
0 |
495 |
77 |
|
6 |
Exclusive Industrial |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
|
6 |
General Industrial |
41 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
41 |
8 |
|
6 |
Total |
49 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
49 |
8 |
Table 3.5 Planning Area Vacant Land Summaries. Part II (Measured in Acres)
|
Planning Area |
Zoning Districts |
Land Available |
Vacant
Build able Land Available |
Build able Acres Slated for Develop-ment |
Acres Slated
for Develop-ment |
Net
Vacant Land |
Net
Vacant Build able Land |
|
7 |
Residential |
33 |
13 |
10 |
7 |
26 |
6 |
|
7 |
Highway Business |
62 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
62 |
16 |
|
7 |
General Industrial |
171 |
126 |
0 |
0 |
171 |
126 |
|
7 |
Total |
266 |
155 |
10 |
7 |
256 |
148 |
|
8 |
Residential |
28 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
6 |
|
8 |
State |
76 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
76 |
0 |
|
8 |
Highway Business |
26 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
8 |
|
8 |
Downtown Business |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
8 |
General Industrial |
12 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
12 |
|
8 |
Total |
143 |
27 |
0 |
0 |
143 |
27 |
|
9 |
Residential |
18 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
18 |
|
9 |
Highway Business |
5 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
3 |
|
9 |
General Industrial |
144 |
126 |
0 |
0 |
144 |
126 |
|
9 |
Total |
167 |
147 |
0 |
0 |
167 |
147 |
|
10 |
Residential |
201 |
139 |
103 |
84 |
98 |
55 |
|
10 |
General Industrial |
64 |
52 |
59 |
48 |
5 |
4 |
|
10 |
Total |
265 |
191 |
162 |
132 |
103 |
59 |
|
11 |
Residential |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
11 |
State |
353 |
146 |
0 |
0 |
353 |
146 |
|
11 |
Highway Business |
6 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
6 |
|
11 |
General Industrial |
14 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
11 |
|
11 |
Total |
374 |
164 |
0 |
0 |
374 |
164 |
|
12 |
Residential |
81 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
81 |
9 |
|
12 |
State |
80 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
80 |
30 |
|
12 |
Highway Business |
9 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
3 |
|
12 |
Total |
170 |
42 |
0 |
0 |
170 |
42 |
Table 3.5 Planning Area Vacant Land Summaries. Part III (Measured in
Acres)
|
Planning Area |
Zoning Districts |
Land Available |
Vacant
Build able Land Available |
Build able Acres Slated for Develop-ment |
Acres Slated
for Develop-ment |
Net
Vacant Land |
Net
Vacant Build able Land |
|
13 |
Residential |
32 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
15 |
|
13 |
General Industrial |
14 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
1 |
|
13 |
Total |
46 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
16 |
|
|
Total |
3588 |
1734 |
249 |
185 |
2899 |
1549 |
Table
3.6 Westborough's Vacant Land Summary
(Measured in Acres).
|
Zoning Districts |
Land Available |
Vacant
Build able Land Available |
Build able Acres Slated for Develop-ment |
Acres Slated
for Develop-ment |
Net
Vacant Land |
Net
Vacant Build able Land |
|
Residential/PPD |
1580 |
871 |
190 |
137 |
1390 |
734 |
|
Highway Business |
108 |
36 |
0 |
0 |
108 |
36 |
|
Downtown Business |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Exclusive Industrial |
247 |
43 |
0 |
0 |
247 |
42 |
|
General Industrial |
499 |
347 |
59 |
48 |
440 |
299 |
|
State |
1153 |
437 |
0 |
0 |
1153 |
437 |
|
Total |
3588 |
1734 |
249 |
185 |
2899 |
1549 |
Explanations
for each column heading in Tables 3.5 & 3.6 are as follows:
Zoning Districts - All zoning districts in Westborough with the exceptions of Garden
Apartments (area already occupied), Town-owned property, and conservation
property.
Land Available - Identified as total undeveloped property from all Westborough's
prescribed zoning districts except those stated in 1.
Vacant Build able Land Available - Build able land available for development is
simply the total vacant land from each zoning district minus the known natural
inhibitors of development such as steep slopes, wetlands, and the 100-year
flood plain. Although no property owner
cannot be denied "reasonable" development rights, this analysis views
that building in these areas as inherently unsafe and contrary to current
American Planning Association planning practice. The reason these natural factors were removed from the total
vacant land available is as follows:
Slopes - Slopes 25% and
greater should be avoided for clearing, regrading or construction due to the
high potential for erosion and consequent sedimentation of water courses and
water bodies.
Wetlands - These identified
areas and the 100-foot buffer should be avoided for construction due to its
storm water filtering ability and wildlife potential.
100-year
Flood Plain
- Sound planning practice excludes
this land from development.
Build able
Acres Slated for Development - The total acres including in the conceptual stages
of planning and development.
Acres
Slated for Development - The
net result of subtracting the unbuildable area from the area slated for
development.
Net Vacant
Land - The total vacant land
available from a particular zoning district minus the acres slated for
development (Column 2 minus Column 4).
Net Vacant Build
able Land - The approximate build
able area remaining in each zoning district after the build able acres slated
for development are subtracted from the total build able land available (Column
3 minus Column 5).
Single Family Build-out Estimates. The single family
build-out estimate analysis is relatively straight forward for zoned
residential parcels. The assumptions
used to derive the single family build-out estimates are:
+ Assumes property owners
are willing to release their property for development.
+ Assumes land containing
slopes of 25% and greater, wetlands, and/or the 100-year flood plain to be
uneconomical to develop and thereby deemed unbuildable.
+ Assumes current zoning
will not change to include additional multifamily use.
+ Assumes 10% of land is
dedicated to affordable units due to the comprehensive permitting process. This equates to 3 to 4 units per build able
acre.
+ Assumes maximum
development potential for each parcel unmodified by limits on infrastructure,
potential market saturation, or Town actions to remove land from development.
+ Assumes vital access is
present or is possible in the future.
+ Assumes the net build
able area will satisfy current zoning's 200-foot frontage requirement, the
50,000 sq. ft. lot area requirement, and will receive building permits.
+ Assumes roads compromise
10% of land within a definitive subdivision.
+ Assumes residential
development will occur only within residentially zoned land.
+ Assumes net build able
acres are square. This simplifies
calculations and would allow for maximum single family build-out estimates
under current zoning.
The
single family build-out estimates were derived by taking the net build able
area from the zoned residential/PPD area, less the 10% for roads, and divided
by the minimum lot size of 50,000 square feet.
Because affordable housing is assumed in the build-out estimates, a
separate equation to include 10% for affordable units is necessary. The following two computations illustrate
both applications:
Market Single Family Build-out Estimate = (Net Build able Area Zoned
Residential/PPD - 10% of Net Area for Roads) / 50,000 sq. ft.
= (734 ac. – 73.4 ac.) / 50,000 sq. ft.
= 575 Potential New Homes
Market Single Family & Affordable Housing Build-out Estimate = { (Net
Build able Area Zoned Residential/PPD - 10% of Net Area for Roads) (10% of
developable area less roads x 3 units) = Affordable Houses} + { (Net Build able
Area Zoned Residential/PPD - 20% of net area for Roads and Affordable Housing)
/ 50,000 = Market single family homes}.
= (734 ac. – 73.4 ac.) (66.1 ac. x 3 units)
= 198 Affordable Houses + (734 ac. – 146.8 ac.) / 50,000 sq. ft. = 511 Market Single Family Homes.
= 709 Potential New Homes
It
must be emphasized that the potential 575 to 709 market and affordable new
homes in addition to current and anticipated housing construction are based on
development occurring only in parcels zoned for single families. These estimates are based on mathematics and
perfectly square build able parcels.
Although these estimates do not take into account the economic
feasibility of constructing in less than ideal circumstances, these estimates
of between 575-709 new homes give a good glimpse of what Westborough's
residential infrastructure would have to carry if and when total build-out
occurred. Figure 3.5 shows how the total single family unit build-out is
distributed across the Town. It
includes the current and anticipated housing construction as of December
2002-December 2007 and the potential additional single family households each
planning area could carry.
Figure
3.5 Residential Build-Out Distribution
|
Planning Area |
Current and
Anticipated Households Construction (2003-2007 |
Potential Additional Single
Family Units Per Planning Area* |
|
1 |
79 |
197 |
|
2 |
52 |
110 |
|
3 |
21 |
102 |
|
4 |
---- |
26 |
|
5 |
--- |
55 |
|
6 |
---- |
0 |
|
7 |
1 |
5 |
|
8 |
---- |
5 |
|
9 |
--- |
14 |
|
10 |
---- |
43 |
|
11 |
53 |
1 |
|
12 |
---- |
7 |
|
13 |
---- |
12 |
|
Total |
227 including ANR’s |
577 |
Growth Scenarios. Westborough's population by the year 2007 is
projected to be 19,504. This figure
takes into account the projected housing construction from 2002 to 2007. If we assume current building trends
continue as they have, then at least hypothetically the 575 single family
housing build-out estimate could occur by the middle of year 2019. This of course assumes the current single
family lot releases which have averaged 37 over the past 7 years continues to
do so (575 potential homes/ 37 lots per year = 16 years). If the 709 build-out estimate is used, then
the single family build-out could occur by the year 2022 (709 homes / 37 lots
per year = 19 years). It must be
emphasized that these growth scenarios would only occur under ideal circumstances,
and therefore the number of potential homes and the timing of the above
scenario would probably not come to reality.
Although
the total number of homes and the time frame would occur only under the best of
circumstances, it does at least tell us the potential population Westborough
may face in the future. For instance,
if in one scenario the 575 single family estimate was multiplied by the current
2.65 household multiplier, an increase of 1,524 people would have to be added
to the projection for the year 2007. If
in the second scenario the 709 single family estimate is used, then 1,879 would
be added to the year 2007 projection.
Table
3.7 Single Family Build-Out
Population Projections.
|
Year |
Calculations |
Population Projections |
|
Current Population
(as of 12/1/02) |
|
18,000 |
|
2007 |
(Table 2,
Appendix C) |
19,504 |
|
2019
(scenario 1) |
19,504 +
1,524 |
21,028 |
|
2022
(scenario 2) |
19,504 +
1,879 |
21,383 |
Although
it is unlikely the maximum build-out or population projections would ever be
reached under current zoning, it would be wise to plan future Town requirements
based on the maximum projections. In
the event Westborough's zoning philosophy changes, or the typical family size
changes, or housing technology changes to accommodate increased single family
densities, or if any unforeseeable event occurs, then the build-out growth
scenarios above should be re-evaluated and planned accordingly.